Recent Posts
- California’s Impressive Waste Management Statistics…
- Note To President-elect Obama: Send Cash To California First…
- Oil Drilling California Out Of Debt?
- California Gas Tax Increase On The Radar Screen
- Heading Full-Speed Toward The Cliff…
- Confirming California’s Heavy Construction Numbers…
- Massive Medical Campus Proposal and Solar Projects
- Shift To Public Works Construction In Southern California
- “…Random, Politically Incorrect Thoughts”
- One More Try…
Recent Comments
- Paul on California Gas Tax Increase On The Radar Screen
- Grizzly on California Off-Road Diesel Rules Become Law June 15, 2008
- dirt-mover@hotmail.com on Confirming California’s Heavy Construction Numbers…
- dirt-mover on Massive Medical Campus Proposal and Solar Projects
- gmoney on California's Singing Highway Back By Popular Demand…
Most Commented On
- California Off-Road Diesel Rules Become Law June 15, 2008 (3)
- California’s Singing Highway (3)
- Governor Declares Drought—Wants $11.9 Billion Water Bond (2)
- California Gas Tax Increase On The Radar Screen (1)
- Confirming California’s Heavy Construction Numbers… (1)
Archives
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
Blog
Court Order Halts New Storm Water Discharge Rules
July 9, 2008
An Orange County Court has surprised construction industry representatives by issuing a peremptory writ of mandate, effectively stopping the State Water Resources Control Board and The California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region, from enforcing new strict water runoff rules at construction sites. These included a six month construction ban during “wet seasons”.
The Construction Industry Coalition on Water Quailty (CIAWQ) has summarized what the proposed regs would have required:
Revised General Construction Permit for Storm Water Discharges
1. The Revised General Construction Permit requires you to do a
complicated construction site risk analysis to determine which Best
Management Practices (BMPs) you will have to use. You’ll have to hire a
consultant to prepare the analysis and prepare your Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP).
2. The Revised Permit requires most site operators to take water samples
during rainfall events that produce more than ½ inch of rain and test the
water for turbidity and pH. If you are a “medium” or “high” risk site, you
will have to sample the water at the discharge point into a stream or
municipal storm drain system.
3. The Revised Permit forces site operators to comply with a “numeric
effluent limit” for turbidity. If you exceed the number, then you will be
fined $32,500 per day for every day you exceed the number.
4. The Revised Permit forces you to re-do your SWPPP if you prepared it
under the current system, and depending upon your location in
you may have to re-engineer your project to comply with new post-construction
runoff handling standards.
5. The Revised Permit allows the public to protest the contents of your
SWPPP after you’ve received a Waste Discharge Identification (WDID)
number from the State and started installing your BMPs and working on
your site. Also, the Regional Board can disagree with your site risk
analysis, and force you to re-do your SWPPP and install more or different
BMPs, even after you’ve started your project
The cities of Arcadia, Bellflower, Carson, Cerritos, Claremont, Commerce, Downey, Duarte, Gardena, Glendora, Hawaiian Gardens, Irwindale, Lawndale, Monterey Park, Paramount, Santa Fe Springs, Signal Hill, Vernon, Walnut, West Covina and Whittier and the Building Industry Legal Defense Foundation joined the case against the State Water Resources Control Board and The California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region, which includes the Ventura Board, according to CIAWQ.
The State will undoubtedly readdresses its perceived need for these strict water run-off regulations.
Posted by Loren Faulkner on July 9, 2008 | Comments (0)
| |||
California Builder and Engineer - Current Issue



