Recent Posts
- Construction Statistics Still Down
- Vote YES on Prop 1a
- Mechanic’s Liens Lawsuits Triple In So Cal
- Soaring In Southern California
- No Deal Yet
- AGC of California Explains Infrastructure Needs
- What Green Will Mean
- Will One Penny Break California’s Budget Impasse?
- Governor Slashes State Employee’s Salaries, Fires Others Today
- California Construction Snapshot
Recent Comments
- Tired in Hawaii on Governor Slashes State Employee’s Salaries, Fires Others Today
- pelatoperforza on Is Green Building Too Good To Be True?
- Tessy on Governor Declares Drought—Wants $11.9 Billion Water Bond
- Paras on Governor Declares Drought—Wants $11.9 Billion Water Bond
- Tessy on California Off-Road Diesel Rules Become Law June 15, 2008
Most Commented On
- California Off-Road Diesel Rules Become Law June 15, 2008 (2)
- Governor Declares Drought—Wants $11.9 Billion Water Bond (2)
- Governor Slashes State Employee’s Salaries, Fires Others Today (1)
- Is Green Building Too Good To Be True? (1)
- Snapshot of Construction Materials and Fuel Pricing Increases (1)
Archives
Blog
Is Green Building Too Good To Be True?
July 17, 2008
Question to building contractors: Do strict new Green Building Codes make life more bearable for people (measurably) or do they mainly add unreasonable, expensive rules that add costs and time delays to construction? Or is it something in between? We would appreciate your response in light of Gov. Schwarzenegger Statement today (July 17th) on
“With today’s action,
I know our readers would like to see your comments…
Posted by Loren Faulkner on July 17, 2008 | Comments (1)
In response to: Is Green Building Too Good To Be True?
pelatoperforza commented:
As long as "green building" is intended as more than just water management and site sustainability, this is a good thing...Green building done right, to address wall and roof systems, orientation, shading, etc. is definitely a good investment for the Industry and the Owners and can pay for itself in a few years, depending on the home's size and location. Most of the additional expenses can be sorted out by making practical decisions at "desk-level", during design, planning and engineering phases. This will save a lot of money when compared to "seat-of_the-pants solutions adopted during construction...
| |||
California Builder and Engineer - Current Issue



