Recent Posts
- Do Your Duty For Road Construction
- Acronyms and Alligator Alley
- Thousands Participate in Georgia Branch, AGC Safety Stand Down
- Want To Lease An Interstate?
- By The Numbers: A Look At Road Conditions And Cost-Effectiveness
- So How's Business?
- Be Careful Out There
- Exploring 60 Years Of Lifting
- Watch Your Stuff!
- Earn Recognition For Your Work Zone Safety Efforts
Recent Comments
- PemiRobin on Caveat Contractors -- Scam Alert!
Most Commented On
Archives
Blog
Is Green Good For The Green?
March 27, 2008
Though Saint Patrick’s Day 2008 is now a thing of the past, “green” continues to be a key word on the construction scene. Case in point: the city of
Chamblee’s City Council voted unanimously in favor of the idea. The result: Beginning April 1, 2009, in Chamblee, all new construction projects of more than 20,000 square feet and all new municipal buildings, regardless of size, must be recognized by either the GBI’s Green Globes system or the U.S. Green Building Council’s LEED system.
According to a release from the Green Building Initiative Chamblee's legislation makes the
“We congratulate the progressive leadership of Chamblee, particularly the mayor and members of its city council, for taking a leadership role in the improvement of our built environment,” noted Ward Hubbell, president of the GBI. “Policies like Chamblee’s demonstrate that multiple options geared to mainstream design and building professionals can be used to encourage the accelerated adoption of green building practices.”
Over at city hall, they’re enthusiastic about it too.
“We’re very proud to be the first city in the state of
So “green” is definitely in. But is everybody into green? I heard a contractor the other day questioning whether it makes business sense in the long run.
Here’s what he was asking: does “green” make sense for the “green”?
I know that, across the construction community, there are varying views on the subject. What are yours?
Posted by Steve Hudson on March 27, 2008 | Comments (0)



